Showing posts with label matt kanninen is an abuser of women and children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label matt kanninen is an abuser of women and children. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

How Many Times Can a Woman Be Killed?



I recently read about a man convicted of murdering another woman after already having killed two different women before. The details are horrifying, but what struck me was not the crime itself. It was the time line of one perpetrator, convicted and serving three different murder raps, for three different women. So, how many chances does a violent offender get, in comparison to the chances women are given to live? How many women have to die before society decides someone is too dangerous to release?

I ask because I am a survivor of violence. I am a survivor of rape. I am a survivor of domestic abuse. I am a survivor of strangulation. I have spent much of my life listening to conversations about violence against women that seem disconnected from the reality many women like me live.

We talk about murder as if it appears out of nowhere. It rarely does.

The murder is often the last thing that happens. Before that comes the stalking. The threats. The coercion. The assault. The rape. The choking. The fear. The police reports. The restraining orders. The friends who say leave. The family members who say give him another chance. The professionals who miss the warning signs. The judges who see another case file. The community that assumes someone else will step in.

Then a woman dies.

Afterward everyone asks how it happened.

Women often know exactly how it happened. We watched it happen.

One of the strangest realities of being a woman in America is how much responsibility we are expected to carry for preventing our own victimization. 

Watch your drink. Watch your surroundings. Don't walk alone. Don't park there. Don't wear that. Carry this. Download that. Text when you get home. Share your location. Take self-defense. Buy cameras. Buy alarms. Buy pepper spray.

Women spend enormous amounts of time learning how to survive men who should have been stopped long before they encountered us.

That does not mean all men are dangerous. It means dangerous men are often allowed too many opportunities.

I find myself wondering whether we need a different framework entirely.



We track gang violence. We track terrorism. We track hate crimes. Why are we not better at tracking femicide? Why do we still struggle to identify patterns in violence against women when the patterns are often obvious?

A man who murders his wife rarely begins as a murderer. A man who rapes rarely begins with rape. A man who strangles rarely begins with strangulation. Violence escalates. That should matter more than it currently does.

As a child, I learned something many girls learn far too young. The world often expects women to adapt to danger instead of demanding that danger adapt to us. I survived incest. I survived sexual violence. I survived men who believed their wants mattered more than my humanity. Like many women, I learned to scan rooms, calculate risks, memorize exits, and prepare for outcomes before they happened. Survival became a skill set.

But survival should not be the standard.

Safety should be the standard.

I believe this is one of the rare issues that should unite Americans across political lines. Conservatives talk about law and order, public safety, and protecting families. Liberals talk about gender violence, survivor support, and prevention. Both sides should be able to agree that repeat violent offenders should not receive endless opportunities to create new victims. Both sides should be able to agree that women deserve to come home alive. Both sides should be able to agree that strangulation, stalking, serial domestic violence, and repeated sexual violence are major warning signs that deserve serious intervention.

I am not interested in a war between men and women. I am interested in reducing the number of women who are raped, beaten, stalked, and murdered. That seems like a goal any civilized society should share.

I have spent my life surviving violence. I would rather spend the second half of it helping prevent violence.

The question is not whether we know enough to do better. The question is whether we are willing to act on what we already know.

Women should not have to become experts in survival to earn the right to live ordinary lives.

That should be the baseline.

Not the aspiration.


Thursday, September 25, 2025

How the California and Nevada Courts Enabled Abuse: My Story

 On September 24, 2025, the Alameda Superior Court denied my ADA Request (No. 2025-131). This ruling was not only late — leaving me no time to respond before the next hearing — but it also exposed my confidential medical information by circulating it to opposing counsel and county officials. The denial of ADA protections has stripped me of privacy, due process, and meaningful access to the courts.

This is not an isolated event. It is part of a larger pattern of fraud, misrepresentation, and collusion involving multiple attorneys, judges, and jurisdictions — all used by my ex-husband, Matthew Kanninen, to silence me and keep me from protecting myself and my child.

The Lawyers Involved

  • In Nevada, Matthew is represented by Molly Rosenblum. I had a consultation with Ms. Rosenblum years ago, after being referred by another attorney I paid. She yelled at me through the phone while her assistant handled the call, a tactic that now looks designed to let her later deny she had ever worked with me. Despite this prior contact, Rosenblum now represents Matthew in Nevada — a clear conflict of interest.

  • In California, Matthew is represented by Mary Elizabeth Grant, who has coordinated filings in Alameda to secure custody orders behind my back. These filings ignored the standing 2021 order that required a DVRO hearing before any custody changes.

The Court’s Role

Judges in Alameda have allowed these filings to go forward despite:

  • Misrepresentations and false statements that I had warrants or had “fled.”

  • Improper notice, leaving me unable to defend myself.

  • My documented need for ADA accommodations, which were flatly denied.

At the same time, the court has denied me any award of legal fees, leaving me unable to obtain comparable representation. Meanwhile, Matthew exhausts enormous funds to employ multiple lawyers across jurisdictions. This raises serious questions about asset concealment and misuse of the courts to shield financial misconduct.

What This Means

This is not just a custody case. It is a systemic failure in which:

  • Domestic violence survivors are denied protection.

  • Disabled litigants are stripped of ADA rights.

  • Courts in two states are being manipulated to serve the interests of one man with connections and resources.

I believe this pattern rises to the level of a conspiracy and even potential RICO violations — with interstate coordination between Nevada and California courts being used to suppress my rights and silence me.

What Comes Next

Because I cannot get justice in these courts, I am escalating this matter to the White House, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Civil Rights Division. I am also sharing my story with conservative media and national outlets, because California cannot be allowed to continue using its courts to endanger domestic violence survivors, silence disabled litigants, and strip parents of their rights.

The names are clear: Matthew Kanninen, Molly Rosenblum, Mary Elizabeth Grant, and the judges of Alameda County. Their actions must be scrutinized, because justice in America cannot survive if courts are weaponized against the vulnerable.